Hello,
This one is not the Thomas in my tree.
Thomas PEACOCK b. 1831 Bitton - parents James PEACOCK & Hannah ISLES
groom's name: Thomas Peacock
groom's birth date: 1833
groom's birthplace:
groom's age: 21
bride's name: Mary Ann Peacock
bride's birth date: 1833
bride's birthplace:
bride's age: 21
marriage date: 26 Apr 1854
marriage place: Kingswood (Near Bristol), Gloucester, England
groom's father's name: James Peacock
groom's mother's name:
bride's father's name: William Peacock
bride's mother's name:
groom's race:
groom's marital status:
groom's previous wife's name:
bride's race:
bride's marital status:
The Thomas PEACOCK in my tree was born abt 1833 in Bitton to parents Daniel & Ann WILMOT.
I thought my Thomas had married his cousin Mary Ann but the more complete marriage record above shows that the father of Thomas is James. I will agree it's a pity the marriage record does not say Thomas was born in 1831 and hence provide a bit more support that it's not my Thomas. I will explain later why I've also considered the possibility that it is my Thomas and that the 'James' is an error.
Since there is another Thomas PEACOCK born in the same place I'd like a look up please for Thomas in 1841 & 1851. I hope in 1841 he is with his parents James & Hannah and that in 1851 there is something to distinguish him from my Thomas born about 2 years later. The census might have born Bitton or born Oldland.
I hope this makes sense.
Regards,
Dave
This one is not the Thomas in my tree.
Thomas PEACOCK b. 1831 Bitton - parents James PEACOCK & Hannah ISLES
groom's name: Thomas Peacock
groom's birth date: 1833
groom's birthplace:
groom's age: 21
bride's name: Mary Ann Peacock
bride's birth date: 1833
bride's birthplace:
bride's age: 21
marriage date: 26 Apr 1854
marriage place: Kingswood (Near Bristol), Gloucester, England
groom's father's name: James Peacock
groom's mother's name:
bride's father's name: William Peacock
bride's mother's name:
groom's race:
groom's marital status:
groom's previous wife's name:
bride's race:
bride's marital status:
The Thomas PEACOCK in my tree was born abt 1833 in Bitton to parents Daniel & Ann WILMOT.
I thought my Thomas had married his cousin Mary Ann but the more complete marriage record above shows that the father of Thomas is James. I will agree it's a pity the marriage record does not say Thomas was born in 1831 and hence provide a bit more support that it's not my Thomas. I will explain later why I've also considered the possibility that it is my Thomas and that the 'James' is an error.
Since there is another Thomas PEACOCK born in the same place I'd like a look up please for Thomas in 1841 & 1851. I hope in 1841 he is with his parents James & Hannah and that in 1851 there is something to distinguish him from my Thomas born about 2 years later. The census might have born Bitton or born Oldland.
I hope this makes sense.
Regards,
Dave
Last edited: