• Important Update: Our New Email Domain

    Please note: We've updated our email domain to familyhistory.email. All our emails will be from this domain.

  • Do you love Genealogy? Why not write for us? we're looking for volunteers to write articles for Family history. Please contact us for further information.

Another Batchelor with strange goings on.

I can not find any trace of Blanch or Stephen. If Blanch remarried or lived in with someone they may have taken on his name.
 
Something to ponder..

I don't fully understand the thread yet, but one or both of this combination keeps appearing [using first names] and is starting to look right...

Marriages Q3 1877
Hill Edwin John V
RANCE George Stephen
RANN George Stephen
YOUREN Elizabeth Blanche
Southampton 2c, 40

1881
RD: Winchester
Ref: Piece: 1233; Folio: 13; Page: 26
Edwin John V. Hill 29 [b. Portsmouth. Boot maker]
Elizabeth Hill 23 [b. Southampton]
Stephen Richard Hill 6 [b. Southampton]
Blanche Ellen Hill 2 [b. Southampton]
Violet Louisa Hill

Blanche and Violet - mmn = Youren.

Geoff

EDIT: I can't see a Stephen Richard Hill that would fit properly..
 
Last edited:
Something to ponder..

I don't fully understand the thread yet, but one or both of this combination keeps appearing [using first names] and is starting to look right...

Marriages Q3 1877
Hill Edwin John V
RANCE George Stephen
RANN George Stephen
YOUREN Elizabeth Blanche
Southampton 2c, 40
I guess the Surname Youren should be Batchelor though :rolleyes:

Geoff
 
Somethings not right :confused:

Is this the only child or were there more?

Name: Stephen Richard Batchelor
Event Type: Christening
Event Date: 05 Jul 1874
Event Place: Southampton, Hampshire, England, United Kingdom
Father's Name: Richard Batchelor
Mother's Name: Blanche Batchelor

.
I don't suppose there is a DoB with this, Gibbo?

Geoff
 
1911 census

Name: Richard Batchelor
Event Place: Southampton, Hampshire, England, United Kingdom
County: Hampshire
Parish: Southampton
Sub-District: Southampton Eastern
Sub-District Number: 1
District Number: 99
Enumeration District: 35
Registration District: Southampton
Age: 54
Marital Status: Married
Occupation: AUCTIONEERS PORTER
Industry: AUCTIONEERS
Number in Family: 2
Birth Year (Estimated): 1857
Birthplace: Southampton, Hampshire
Schedule Type: 317
Page Number: 1
Registration Number: RG14
Piece/Folio: 637
Richard Batchelor Head Male 54 Southampton, Hampshire
Sarah Batchelor Servant Female 55 Southampton, Hampshire
 
On the 1911 census can someone check please if there is any further info such as how long does he state his been married for and are there any kids noted.
 
On the 1911 census can someone check please if there is any further info such as how long does he state his been married for and are there any kids noted.
He says married 34 y and still married, one child born alive and one living.

Partial copy for ID..

Batchelor_R.png

Geoff
 
Saying he is still married is not helpful, unless Elizabeth Blanche is a sister of Blanche? That said, married 34y = 1877. Post #2 has the marriage as 1873?

Geoff
 
Something to ponder..

I don't fully understand the thread yet, but one or both of this combination keeps appearing [using first names] and is starting to look right...

Marriages Q3 1877
Hill Edwin John V
RANCE George Stephen
RANN George Stephen
YOUREN Elizabeth Blanche
Southampton 2c, 40

1881
RD: Winchester
Ref: Piece: 1233; Folio: 13; Page: 26
Edwin John V. Hill 29 [b. Portsmouth. Boot maker]
Elizabeth Hill 23 [b. Southampton]
Stephen Richard Hill 6 [b. Southampton]
Blanche Ellen Hill 2 [b. Southampton]
Violet Louisa Hill
In any event, this Stephen was born 3y before their marriage!

Geoff
 
Saying he is still married is not helpful, unless Elizabeth Blanche is a sister of Blanche? That said, married 34y = 1877. Post #2 has the marriage as 1873?

Geoff

And Sarah Batchelor is noted as widow :confused: That 1911 just makes things more confusing. Appears he is claiming fatherhood to one child, Stephen maybe.
 
And Sarah Batchelor is noted as widow :confused: That 1911 just makes things more confusing.
It does o_O

It may be better to wait until Keith reviews it he will have more background on the family. It may just be coincidence with the 'Hill' theory.

Geoff

EDIT: Unless as you say, Stephen is that one child.
 
Back
Top