• Family History UK policy on the posting of census transcriptions:

    British Census images and data are Crown Copyright.

    The National Archives has relinquished Crown Copyright on documents within its control provided certain conditions are met. Basically you must ensure that the information is accurate, in context and you are required to include
    (a) an acknowledgement that the record is in the care of TNA
    (b) the full reference of the document.

    Where you have posted information that is Crown Copyright, you MUST add the following statement:
    "This information Crown Copyright and is from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk"

    For complete guidance, please view the Copyright statement from The National Archives at: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/legal/copyright.htm

    You MUST also ensure you remove any details that identify the transcription as being from a particular subscription site,
    and you MUST ensure that by posting transcriptions that you personally do not break any licence agreements or any terms of use set by other organisation's or subscription sites.

    Please report all Copyright Infringements to:
    Forum Moderator or Admin or directly to via our contact form.
  • All members must be aware of our current Family History UK Community Rules

    Please read the following:

    Read the current rules of the forum

    Thank you

    If you are a business -please contact us to advertise or be a sponsor on our FHUK Community Genealogy forums

Charles in Bromley Hurst

#1
For the 1841 Census information that I have, it lists at
Bromley Hurst, Staffordshire, Radmore Wood,

Isaac CHARLES aged 65 (farmer) born this parish
Elizabeth CHARLES aged 35
then their children Eliza, Thomas, Elizabeth and Isaac.

Could someone please review this and see if it is possible that the age of Isaac snr could have been misread. I think it should actually be 35yrs.
Or would I have to view the original scan?

Thanks in Advance
DaveHall
 

Similar threads

Top