hi
ok.... so ive got a possibility here, im not sure about what was legal back in 1793 and 1816.
william hill married rachael hutchinson in 1816, williams father was william, his parents might have been john and elizabeth was his wife.
rachael hutchinsons mother was betty hill, bettys parents might have been - john and elizabeth!
so ive got the prospect that john and elizabeths grandchildren married!
now was this legal? could they have married cousins back then? if not then it would give me william (seniors) father (two options - not sure which are the right ones).
EDIT
found another possible betty... so its not certain , but ill still ask the relationship question any way
ok.... so ive got a possibility here, im not sure about what was legal back in 1793 and 1816.
william hill married rachael hutchinson in 1816, williams father was william, his parents might have been john and elizabeth was his wife.
rachael hutchinsons mother was betty hill, bettys parents might have been - john and elizabeth!
so ive got the prospect that john and elizabeths grandchildren married!
now was this legal? could they have married cousins back then? if not then it would give me william (seniors) father (two options - not sure which are the right ones).
EDIT
found another possible betty... so its not certain , but ill still ask the relationship question any way
Last edited: