-
Do you love Genealogy? Why not write for us? we're looking for volunteers to write articles for Family history. Please contact us for further information.
Thanks, Amanda.
It has to be a front runner, there are a couple of others in the correct area [assuming she stayed in West Ham after 1930] that are close that I haven't eliminated yet.
Deaths Q1 1913
Goodwin Mary A
46 W Ham
4a, 132
Deaths Q1 1939
Goodwin Mary A
71
Essex S.W.
4a, 298
[Before 1935 included West Ham]
Geoff
It has to be a front runner, there are a couple of others in the correct area [assuming she stayed in West Ham after 1930] that are close that I haven't eliminated yet.
Deaths Q1 1913
Goodwin Mary A
46 W Ham
4a, 132
Deaths Q1 1939
Goodwin Mary A
71
Essex S.W.
4a, 298
[Before 1935 included West Ham]
Geoff
nothing to do with your query but interesting :-
the 1911 census says 9 children born alive, 6 living, 3 died but there are 9 children listed in the household as if they were all there on census night.
Two sons and a daughter have no occupation given and in fact it seems from death indexes that these children, Violet, Oliver and Samuel, died as infants.
Nice that they were still remembered almost 20 yrs on.
Elaine
the 1911 census says 9 children born alive, 6 living, 3 died but there are 9 children listed in the household as if they were all there on census night.
Two sons and a daughter have no occupation given and in fact it seems from death indexes that these children, Violet, Oliver and Samuel, died as infants.
Nice that they were still remembered almost 20 yrs on.
Elaine
Thanks, Elaine.
When I first saw that 1911 census I was surprised and found it misleading as I was finding their offspring had birth and death reg's, yet still recorded in the census. That said, once the census image was understood it became clear. In a sense it was helpful because it was clear proof.
Geoff
When I first saw that 1911 census I was surprised and found it misleading as I was finding their offspring had birth and death reg's, yet still recorded in the census. That said, once the census image was understood it became clear. In a sense it was helpful because it was clear proof.
Geoff
| Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mary Ann ELLIS | English Genealogy Roots | 17 | |
|
|
Mary Ann SYMONS | English Genealogy Roots | 5 | |
|
|
Mary Susanna PLAYFORD | Australia & New Zealand Genealogy Roots | 4 | |
|
|
Mary Hannah SWINDELLS | 1871 Census Request | 15 | |
|
Mary Ann Goodwin | 1891 Census Request | 8 | |
|
|
Mary Ann Goodwin, nee Manuell (there are variants) | Births | 4 |