• Welcome to Family History Forum 🔎

    Dive into a community where unraveling family history is a shared passion. Here, real people collaborate, offering advice, insights, and support in navigating the rich tapestry of genealogy. Engage in vibrant discussions, pose questions, or celebrate your latest findings on our active message boards.

    Whether you're piecing together ancestry or breaking through brick walls in your research, our forum is your essential resource 📚

    Join fellow family historians in this journey, where every story uncovered strengthens the bonds that connect us all 🔗

    Family History UK
  • Do you love Genealogy? Why not write for us? we're looking for volunteers to write articles for Family history. Please contact us for further information.

Mary Frances ADAMS

DaveHam9

Loyal Member
Staff member
Moderator
Posts
84,476
Likes
1,369
Location
Sydney
#1
1911 %
RG14 PN3160 RG78 PN117 RD35 SD2 ED4 SN181
Parish: Cranleigh
County: Surrey
Registration District: Hambledon
RD No: 35
Sub-RD: Cranleigh
ED: 4 SN: 181
Address: Ewhurst Hill Nt Guildford Surrey
Personal Information
Name Mary Frances Adams
Relationship to Head of Household Head
Condition Widow
Gender F
Age 73
Estimated Year of Birth 1838
Occupation Author
Employed Y
Working at Home N
Place of Birth Born in London 23rd of March 1838
Nationality British Subject By Parentage
Enumerator Information
Address Ewhurst Hill Nt Guildford Surrey
Parish Cranleigh
Town Nt Guildford
Type of Building Private House
Number of Rooms 4 Rooms
Inhabited Y
Administrative County Surrey
Registration District Hambledon
Registration Sub District Cranleigh

I tried and tried various combinations of name and age and ED and SN and RD no and RD and could not find that record on A... today at the library.

What particular bits will bring up that record?

Thanks,

Dave
 

horse

Loyal Member
Posts
29,075
Likes
997
Location
Yorkshire
#2
What particular bits will bring up that record?
I used full name and Dob =1838, London, England. She is transcribed with William Palmer 26 Louise Brande 46 Louisa Brande76, though they don't appear on the image.

Geoff

EDIT: She looks to be in the same place/area in 1891 and 1901.
 

Similar threads

Top