Re: Help Please. Marriage.
If this is in the wrong place, can you please move it to where it should be.
My Mother - Jessie Burgess (nee Redgrave)
Born 26 January 1914
Her Parents:
Jessie Redgrave married William Burgess 31 December 1910
I think I am correct in saying that Jessie Redgrave was born on the 1st August 1890 (but will have to double check that)
It is the Redgrave side I am trying to track down.
According to what little information I have gathered my Grandmother is showing on the 1891 census as being the 8 month old daughter of James (31) and Maggie Redgrave (23) of Farnworth- James showing as coming from Camberwell and Maggie from Hammersmith. It also states that she had a sister called Maggie, which tally's with what I remember.
On the 1901 census – the family has increased and included a son named Charles, which again rings true from what I had been told. However, on this census Maggie is now listed as Margaret and says she comes from Camberwell. I realise the first census probably used Maggie instead of Margaret and on the later census it would appear that possible Camberwell was used as convenience for the two rather than actual fact.
This is where I seem to draw a blank – I have tried several marriage searches on James and Maggie (or Margaret) taking into account the age difference of 10 years, but as yet haven’t received any results. There is a possible, at Bethnall Green, but I am unsure.
Do hope this makes sense.
If this is in the wrong place, can you please move it to where it should be.
My Mother - Jessie Burgess (nee Redgrave)
Born 26 January 1914
Her Parents:
Jessie Redgrave married William Burgess 31 December 1910
I think I am correct in saying that Jessie Redgrave was born on the 1st August 1890 (but will have to double check that)
It is the Redgrave side I am trying to track down.
According to what little information I have gathered my Grandmother is showing on the 1891 census as being the 8 month old daughter of James (31) and Maggie Redgrave (23) of Farnworth- James showing as coming from Camberwell and Maggie from Hammersmith. It also states that she had a sister called Maggie, which tally's with what I remember.
On the 1901 census – the family has increased and included a son named Charles, which again rings true from what I had been told. However, on this census Maggie is now listed as Margaret and says she comes from Camberwell. I realise the first census probably used Maggie instead of Margaret and on the later census it would appear that possible Camberwell was used as convenience for the two rather than actual fact.
This is where I seem to draw a blank – I have tried several marriage searches on James and Maggie (or Margaret) taking into account the age difference of 10 years, but as yet haven’t received any results. There is a possible, at Bethnall Green, but I am unsure.
Do hope this makes sense.
Last edited by a moderator: