Yes, there are some awful transcriptions.
But, whoever does the transcribing may not have the will to spend a lot of time trying to unwind the writing. I assume it is unpaid work, so why are we surprised.
As it's our hobby, we can spend as much time as we like to unravel a name or occupation etc.
If anyone would like to try and read my scrawl, they are very welcome to try, as I often can't read my own writing at times.

:2fun:
I suppose the rub, is the fact that we are paying to look at these records, and that fact that it may have been transcribed very badly.
I would hazard a guess if the transcriber is from an English speaking country, the actual 'scrawl' they are looking at is pretty universal in an English speaking and writing country.
Then there is a question of which font it is being written in, which I do believe there was some sort of etiquette for which style was used, depending on what the document contains legally.
Looking at a Will of the 1800's, once you have a grasp of the font or handwriting, it becomes a lot easier to transcribe. Moving on to another Will, it will be in a different hand or font, so the process of transcribing starts again.
I very much doubt that the transcribers of 'our' documents will be calligraphy experts, but we do hope for better results in any case.
So it seems to come down to time and money.........if the transcribers have time, but not the money, what do we expect of them. If they have the money but not the time, we will get similar results.
I've no idea of what sort of incentives are given to these 'transcribers', but I guess they are essentially selfish or unpaid.
But on the whole, are they not generally quite good. I would think yes, when you consider the amount of documents and the variety of transcribers commitment.
I will still complain to the relevant web site, but generally my whinges will fall on deaf ears, to people who are there to earn a wage from our subs.
Steve.
