UPTON family in Sussex

[DaveHam9]

Hello,

Thomas UPTON b. 1836 Beckley, Sussex

- parents Stephen & Sarah Elizabeth

I'd like a look up please for the family in 1841.

Thanks.

Dave

 

[DaveHam9]

Name: Thomas Upton
Event Type: Census
Event Date: 1841
Gender: Male
Age: 5
Birthplace: Sussex
Schedule Type: Household
Registration District: Cuckfield Union
Sub-District: Lindfield
Parish: Balcombe
County: Sussex

EDIT: That can't be the Thomas in my tree.

Baptism for my Thomas said to be 31 Jul 1836 Beckley but I can't verify that.

 

[DaveHam9]

Name: Thomas Upton
Birth Year (Estimated): 1836
Age: 5
Native Residence Place: Beckley, Sussex, England
Father's Name: Stephen Upton
Mother's Name: Sarah Elizabeth Upton
Spouse's Name:
Spouse's Residence Place:
Spouse's Father's Name:
Spouse's Mother's Name:
Ship Name: Canton
Event Date: 18 Sep 1841
Volume: 40
GS Film number: 416877
Digital Folder Number: 4117092
Image Number: 01243

 

[DaveHam9]

Well, well, well

Arrived September 18, The 'Canton' Crouch master, from Cork the 2nd June, with 207 emigrants, ...

1841 census 6th June

 

[horse]

Spencer Upton
Birth Date: 1848
Father: Stephen Upton
Mother: Sarah
Birth Place: New South Wales
Reg Year: 1848
Reg Place: Field of Mars, Parramatta, New South Wales
Volume Number: V18481450 55

Geoff

 

[horse]

V18451085 30A/1845 UPTON MARY E STEPHEN SARAH
V18461190 31A/1846 UPTON FRANCIS E STEPHEN SARAH

Geoff

 

[DaveHam9]

Thanks Geoff.

I'm not going to trace the others. Son Thomas is my interest and I can't verify his baptism date. At least I have his arrival.

Marriage 3028/1868 UPTIN THOMAS - ALEXANDER SARAH JANE - PARRAMATTA

Deaths
8034/1904 UPTON THOMAS - STEPHEN - SYDNEY
13406/1938 UPTON SARAH JANE 89 YRS SYDNEY SYDNEY


I won't try for another census look up today. :2fun:

 

[horse]

Death:
5133/1865 UPTON SARAH E BENJAMIN SARAH PARRAMATTA

Geoff

 

[horse]

Ok, Dave..

 

[horse]

I won't try for another census look up today. :2fun:

The last 3 all appear to be leaving before the censuses :2fun:

 

[DaveHam9]

Yes.

The author of the tree fell into the same trap with that 1841 census listing for a Thomas.

The Canton could have left after the census but turns out it didn't.